QUESTION : “Theories like the Path-Goal Theory and Situational Leadership Theory lack empirical research support. Therefore, they shouldn’t be used in business practice.” Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Explain your rationale. ”
View more random threads:
- CS304 Object Oriented Programming GDB Solution January 2012
- MGT201 GDB Solution spring 27 May 2011
- Mgmt627 GDB No. 1 fall 2010 November
- Fin623 GDB No. 1 solution Fall 2011 October
- MKT501 Marketing Management GDB Solution Fall Semester 2012
- MCM301 Communication skills vu current GDB Solution Spring...
- FIN621 Financial Statement Analysis GDB No.2 Solution Fall...
- O.B GDB solved May4,2010
- MTH001 - Elementary Mathematics gdb 27 jan 2011
- FIN630 Investment Analysis & Portfolio GDB Solution Fall...
Answer : I disagree with this statement, as both the Situational Leadership and Path-Goal Theory of Leadership are supporting their employee/followers to achieve the predefined goal by carving a clear and easy path, which is in fact a business practice.
In this process the leader will:
• Clarify the path properly.
• Remove obstacles to attain goals.
• Increase the rewards in due course to achieve the goal.
Both theories are supporting contingency planning and empirical research which is a basic of a good business practice. Eempirical research that derives its data by means of direct observation or experiment and used to answer a question or test a hypothesis and the contingency approach which paved the way to manage and that to be effective in terms of planning, organizing, leading, and controlling and tailored to the particular circumstances.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)