QUESTION : “Theories like the Path-Goal Theory and Situational Leadership Theory lack empirical research support. Therefore, they shouldn’t be used in business practice.” Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Explain your rationale. ”View more random threads:
- FIN630 GDB no 02 Solution spring 1 june 2011
- CS403 GDB Solution 12 May 2010
- MTH501 Linear Algebra GDB Solution Fall Semester 2013
- MGT502 Organizational Behavior GDB No. 02 Ideal Solution...
- ECO404 - Managerial Economics GDB 01 Fall 2014 November 2014
- ACC501 GDB Solution May 11,2010
- MGMT Leadership GDB fall 2010 on 29 jan 2011
- CS610 Computer Network GDB No. 01 Solution and Discussion...
- MTH301 Calculus II GDB N0. 1 Discussion Spring 2014 Due...
- MGMT 510 Total Quality Management GDB 23 July 2010
Answer : I disagree with this statement, as both the Situational Leadership and Path-Goal Theory of Leadership are supporting their employee/followers to achieve the predefined goal by carving a clear and easy path, which is in fact a business practice.
In this process the leader will:
• Clarify the path properly.
• Remove obstacles to attain goals.
• Increase the rewards in due course to achieve the goal.
Both theories are supporting contingency planning and empirical research which is a basic of a good business practice. Eempirical research that derives its data by means of direct observation or experiment and used to answer a question or test a hypothesis and the contingency approach which paved the way to manage and that to be effective in terms of planning, organizing, leading, and controlling and tailored to the particular circumstances.
Sponsored Links
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)