QUESTION : “Theories like the Path-Goal Theory and Situational Leadership Theory lack empirical research support. Therefore, they shouldn’t be used in business practice.” Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Explain your rationale. ”View more random threads:
- FIN611 GDB idea solution spring 28 May 2011
- mgt402
- MGT101 GDB solution 20 april 2011
- MTH 302 GDB Spring July 2011 IDEA Solution
- MTH301 GDB IDEA SOLUTIONS fall 2010
- FIN621 GDB 1 discussion fall 2010 idea solution
- MGT602 Entrepreneurship GDB No.3 Fall 2012 Due Date...
- mgt101 Financial Accounting GDB idea solution spring June...
- MGT611 - Business & Labor Law GDB Closing Dat Tuesday,...
- Mgmt611 GDB 1 solution for fall 2011 on 22 OCtober
Answer : I disagree with this statement, as both the Situational Leadership and Path-Goal Theory of Leadership are supporting their employee/followers to achieve the predefined goal by carving a clear and easy path, which is in fact a business practice.
In this process the leader will:
• Clarify the path properly.
• Remove obstacles to attain goals.
• Increase the rewards in due course to achieve the goal.
Both theories are supporting contingency planning and empirical research which is a basic of a good business practice. Eempirical research that derives its data by means of direct observation or experiment and used to answer a question or test a hypothesis and the contingency approach which paved the way to manage and that to be effective in terms of planning, organizing, leading, and controlling and tailored to the particular circumstances.
Sponsored Links
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)